Herobrine has been the pinnacle of Minecraft Creepypasta infamy since his first sighting back in 2010.
This sighting came in the form of an image detailing the encounter, which was posted on 4chan’s /v/ board. The legend began to spiral from there; spawning streams, hoaxes, easter eggs, mods, texture packs, and more.
One of the more well-known hoaxes was Brocraft Streamer, “Copeland’s,” livestream. This hoax was inspired by the original 4chan encounter, and happened well before the legend of Herobrine became the infamous tale it is today.
Did players know that there’s a difference between the canonical and community-made lore for Herobrine? The “canon” lore comes solely from what was depicted in the original sighting, and Copeland’s livestream. Anything that has happened after those two events is regarded to be community-made lore.
So, what are these differences between the canon and community lore? Readers might be surprised to find out that something they’ve known about Herobrine for years hasn’t been canonical after all.
What, or who, “Herobrine,” is
Communally — Herobrine is often depicted holding items such as pickaxes. While he’s known to manipulate the overworld, he isn’t ever canonically seen holding items in his hand. Theorists have also depicted Herobrine as both a villager clad in a black smock and a dead miner.
Movement
Communally — Herobrine is often depicted “possessing” neutral mobs. When he inhabits them, their eyes pale to imitate his hollow, white orbs. Herobrine is theorized to be akin to a player in creative mode, as he creates these traps and structures without the viable resources to do so.
